Geometry

T

TimeLord

Quantum Scribe
All time exists at once. There is no creation of past or present or future, for they all were created already. It is the focus of consciousness which creates the illusion of time's linearity.

In geometric terms, it is the intersection of n-D forms.

The intersection of 2 unequal 1-D lines in 2-D space is a 0-D point. If one of the lines is rotating with respect to the other, the point of intersection will move from negative infinity to positive infinity in half a rotation. This could span eternity if the line represented time.

The intersection of 2 unequal 2-D planes in 3-D space is a 1-D line orthogonal to the normal vectors of both planes.

The intersection of 2 unequal 3-D volumes in 4-D space is a 2-D plane.

Finally, the intersection of 2 unequal 4-D hypervolumes in 5-D space is a 3-D volume, which can describe the entire universe at a given instant. Thus by rotating one of the 4-D hypervolumes, a continuously-moving universe can be created. However, the entire 4-D expanse of space and time always exists; it is only the focus of consciousness that changes linearly.
 
Now there's something I can get my teeth into.

Nice post. I do believe I agree. Have you studied manifold theory? It seems you have.

Welcome to the forum.
RMT

edit to add:

it is only the focus of consciousness that changes linearly.
Click to expand...

Yes, indeed. I believe several people outside myself have suggested that same thing.
 
All time exists at once. There is no creation of past or present or future, for they all were created already. It is the focus of consciousness which creates the illusion of time's linearity.

In geometric terms, it is the intersection of n-D forms.

The intersection of 2 unequal 1-D lines in 2-D space is a 0-D point. If one of the lines is rotating with respect to the other, the point of intersection will move from negative infinity to positive infinity in half a rotation. This could span eternity if the line represented time.

The intersection of 2 unequal 2-D planes in 3-D space is a 1-D line orthogonal to the normal vectors of both planes.

The intersection of 2 unequal 3-D volumes in 4-D space is a 2-D plane.

Finally, the intersection of 2 unequal 4-D hypervolumes in 5-D space is a 3-D volume, which can describe the entire universe at a given instant. Thus by rotating one of the 4-D hypervolumes, a continuously-moving universe can be created. However, the entire 4-D expanse of space and time always exists; it is only the focus of consciousness that changes linearly.
Click to expand...

In my very own limited way I have been try to say something similiar. Good job.
 
That was explained very well, thanks ^^. Some great imagery to spin the mind around.
Is there any limit theoretically to 0-D points? ( IE; many may co-exist at once, or existence reference of one 0-D point suffices for the host of others that follow?).
 
Okay, nm that last post.
"At once" is an indication of the measurement of time, which has already been put aside.
So then the 0-D is more so tied to a 5-D than say 4-D through 1-D correct?
It's not so hard to believe, when we think how many circumstances are created every moment.
I understand that may not be communicated correctly, and will keep it short. Thx.
 
Sorry, don't mean to spam this post.
I have a genuine question though after alot of speculation.
How can a photon be a particle if it occupies no physical space?

How can any "subatomic particle" be a "particle" if it falls into this category of 0-D ?

If something travels from point A to point B, is this not a usage of space?
How would anything 0-D have any coordinate? (If it does not, then how can a photon be "detected" as space is not a consideration, only the measurement of "time"?; furthermore, is not time measured by distance over physical space?).

Take the sun for example. If a photon travelling at the speed of light to Earth, were to "travel" it would have an alpha coordinate, just as the photon in a lab being measured?

So, again what is contradicting here to me (plz clarify), how can something be measured that is without apparent measurement?

If it's true and quarks, electrons, etc occupy no physical space, but are "points" ...
Why would a "point" "travel" ? Would it not just "change position" ?

((Would we say for example, that a photon has construct? if so, how to alter said construct? possible?, if it does not have construct, being a "point" - this would seem to take the "subatomic particle" outside of physics (motion)).

Lastly, (I'm predicting a certain kind of answer here to the above), why would light obey any physical law?
((IE; since there is no such thing as "light density" in this context, why would light refract? "IF" it does have density, should it not as well have form? (tangible particle)).

(Most people I know think of "subatomic" as being extremely small, in this context, 0-D would be neither? - I was reading Quantum articles and one professor stated the above, that subatomic particles are believed to be 0 dimensional, taking up no physical space.)
 
Back
Top