Einstein from the future

deb0and

Temporal Novice
Hi this is my first post here, nice forums.....

I have always been amazed by great people and wondered if they are really from this planet or from the future, the great people seem to come up with all the good ideas and theories!! How? Is simply because they are great? It cant be, for one they have to be more advanced than the average person, how do they get there advancement? They must have prior knowledge to be so advanced. Like Einstein, his brain was pure genius but yet the average people of them years were not very bright, the same goes for Newton. There has to be some explanation for this other than they were geniuses.

Just a thought really, I think Einstein was from the future, his theories were very advanced for the time he existed leading me to belive he had prior knowledge of some sorts. (from the future)
I think what he has done is give us the theories that will unlock the mystery of time travel, i also think somewhere he has left a clue but we are looking too hard and trying to over complicate matters.
 
Just a thought really, I think Einstein was from the future, his theories were very advanced for the time he existed leading me to belive he had prior knowledge of some sorts. (from the future)

Einstein's ideas were very advanced, and I assume that the ideas you refer to were the ideas from 1905 - the "annum mirabilis" (the miracle year).

But from the future? Not likely, His ideas weren't so advanced that coming from the future would be necessary Poincare. Lorentz and Maxwell all played their parts in developing the Special Theory of Relativity beginning in the 1850's. Maxwell worked out the theory of electromagnetism. Lorentz discovered that length is a variable that depends on the relative velocity of an object. Both of them made these discoveries in the mid 19th Century. Poincare introduced the modern principle of relativity. Einstein put them together in the Special Theory of Relativity by making two observations (supported by the proper math and proof):

1. It is not necessary for their to be an eather for light to have the same fixed velocity for all inertial observers.

2. Mass is not a constant in the physical world; it is a variable dependent on relative velocity.

Einstein did it first. But there's little doubt that Poincare would very likely have come to the same conclusions sometime not too long after 1905.

A few years later, of course, Einstein published the General Theory of Relativity. There are two reasons why it took several years for this to happen. The obvious reason is that he had to "think it through" and get his thoughts about the nature of space, time and gravity into a paper. But he also had to go back to school. Einstein wasn't a great mathematician. He had to study and learn advanced analytic geometry because his theory could not be adequately described in terms of partial differential calculus. The General Theory of Relativity is a geometric approach to gravitation that describes how it curves both space and time.

Had he come from the future it wouldn't have been necessary for him to return to the classroom. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
I don't really think he was from the future mate, there is to much about his early life for him to be from the future, that is the main thing that blows the idea of him being from the future out of the water. I can think of a few other reasons as well, but this would be the main reason, I think.
 
howdy

i dont think any of them are from the future, i think its a case of them excelling in one particular field. when an athlet excels at sports they are not from the future. its a case of passion and obbsession. Einsein had many people working with him also, and just because we hear about all his genius ideas, there were planty that were crap.

When they looked at his brian it had expanded just like a muscle making him smarter.

He was a man of God and said that his game was with God and his game was to find the answers god gave him and said he thought god was funny liek him because when he got a question right it led to another question.

so yeah, i dont think he was from teh future, if he was then he woudl have all the answers straight away and not spend a life time picting out little things for a laugh. also if he was from the future did he come as a child!?

i dont want to be at work <font color="red"> [/COLOR]
 
"...but religion for the most part we either say it's the original archaic form, or not at all, instead of having an open mind and evolving it."

if you believe in the bible, the Lord has changed signifigantly over the years. in the bible, the Lord is not looked at as a preacher will tell you he/she/it is. the Lord grows in the bible, he has his mind changed about several things, he does things that he does not want to, etc. the bible says that the Lord used to speak, walk and talk to people. he doesent anymore, wonder why. he went from "an eye for an eye," to "slap me and i will let you slap the other cheek."

in proverbs, he was a "ruthless" god. he avenged the weak, and smote the evil. later on, he was past all that. proverbs was written by king solomon, who had his share of problems and it reflects into his book. we must not forget that these books were written by man. it is up to you to decide what was written in purity and what was written for gain.

the bible was written so that a person would have the knowledge to evolve.
 
Back
Top