Date for Titor's Predictions

Hercules

Temporal Navigator
Date for Titor\'s Predictions

Date for Titor's Predictions

"When the date comes for my prediction it will either happen or not." -Titor

Here Titor says "it" will either happen or not. From interpretations it is concluded that IF Titor is REAL, then Yellowstone eruption would be the “cause” of the Civil War. Also this interpretation is supported by the above Titor's statement, "When the DATE comes for my prediction". So now that TIME has shown that the civil war would not be due to politics and how it was expected in vain that the civil war would start after the 2004 elections.

Why Titor gave confusing statements on the year of his prediction? 2004 or 2005?
May be because he wanted to keep people skeptical.

Now time has shown it is not 2004, but we are still in the middle of 2005. If Titor is real, then the Super volcano has to erupt in the following months before January 2006. If it doesent, then then we can conclude Titor is a hoax and have his writings as an amazing "Literary Work".

After the Yellowstone eruption theory, a few dates were put forward and it did not happen. But the Pacific Plate is STILL active.

For the question, “Why do you keep telling us about the war? How do you know that will even happen in our worldline? Something may have already changed and it won't happen at all.”

Titor answers, “Yes, you are correct! However, I am not confident things are different enough for you to avoid the conflict. You may also consider the possibility that a world with no war is far less desirable in the long run. In response to your other point, your assumptions about causality are correct but my personal morality still comes into play. I won't deviate from my three rules because of the way I would feel about myself.”

This answer once again confirms the Yellowstone theory.

Also he says that the two worldliness are “exactly alike” meaning that the “geology” of the two Worldlines are alike and it is a natural disaster, not a man-made one.

Now the question is, IF Titor is REAL, I repeat, IF Titor is REAL then when will Yellowstone erupt? One way of finding out is to wait just like how we waited to find out the consequences of the Nov 2004 elections. Also April 19th was one of his dates. Now that we know that it is not, there is another date which I have interpreted from his postings.

Titor Wrote:

“I remember going to Disney World at Christmas and I remember going to the
beach in Daytona.”

From a psychological point of view, I can say that Titor is saying that as a kid, it was the last day that life was normal. After that, something terrible happens and so he remembers that date. Also, initially I thought as a kid he has been to Disney World on Dec 25 2004. But now since it has been a while there could be lot of other events that he could have remembered. But he said:

“I remember going to Disney World at Christmas and I remember going to the
beach in Daytona.”

Sunday Dec 25, 2005 is Christmas and there are only six days for 2006. So the day could be the night of Dec 25 2005 or one of the other six days that that follows. But not in 2006 and his predictions can be ruled out on 1st Jan 2006.

Also another observation is the poem.

A Soldier's Winter

The day before it wasn't snowing.
The trees are strangers, leering, disapproving in the ash of winter ..my
world, my life, my wandering path.
I pray God's eyes may once again gaze upon me and remind me that I am still
His child.

I only (think) I remember the first line but the last one I remember. It has quite a few more lines that I don't remember. It is rumored this was written first as a letter by a soldier. After he died it was added to and edited by others. In my opinion, it has become a symbol for the collective guilt my parents' generation feels for what became of the world.


I interpreted that this Soldier, who could have written the poem is one of the soldiers deployed in Iraq today. Now since Bush doesn’t seem to pull back the troops pretty soon, this interpretation could be correct. Also he is talking about winter. Since last winter I thought it could be the “nuclear winter” effect after the Super Volcanic eruption. Now I doubt whether a poem could use such “technical” words and how a person from another part of the world describes something which he has not seen, in a poem. So this could be the next winter of 2005.

I know, this post could make some of the Anti-Titors angry. I admit, there are more chances of Titor being a hoax. I am not denying it and I am not debating on this thread whether it is real or not. But here is what makes me interested in his story:

If Titor is a Hoax, then who is the benefactor? Surely it is not the person who wrote the story which is a master piece, especially the 5100 part of it which no one understands.

And if the benefactors were the hoaxers, then why didn’t they interpret Titor’s story CORRECTLY for all these FOUR years? In the past few months, interpretations on this forum made the Titor story more interesting and real. Why didn’t the hoaxers do that? For all these years they have been giving false interpretations and stuff which are nothing but BS. I can conclude this much. Even if Titor is a Haox, then that person is different from those who benefit from his postings.
 
Re: Date for Titor\'s Predictions

You're points about what he remembers are interesting.


Opaque Glass

By Mary Gallagher



The cold had frosted the window

Until she was hardly able to see outside,

But she wasn’t concerned with that glass.

In her eyes was reflected a crystalline hope

Dancing balefully on the blinking television.

The snow might as well have been ash.



The ruins of Baghdad chocked her fireplace with ash

As media smoke slithered through the chimney window.

She was ensorcelled by the diablerie of the television

And the surreal horrors occurring outside

Which fractured her one single hope

Like a spider’s web of cracks stretching across glass.



The sun bled in fractured rainbows through a glass.

Unexpectedly, it was a gentler touch then the gritty ash.

So she clung to her harassed hope

And threw wide open the iced window

Where, innocuous, life continued calmly outside,

Indifferent of the cruel television.



Perhaps it was all a myth, what the television

Said. Truth could lie behind either glass.

Still, she hesitated to venture outside

Because she feared to be marked by the ash.

Only when she shut the window

Could she maintain her feeble hope



Because reality would doom the hope,

As she learned from watching television.

So she let the crystals crawl across the slumbering window.

Before long, they conquered its panes of glass

And the unfeeling white veiled any trace of black ash

Along with the duplicity of what was outside.



There she hid, without a taint of the outside

To threaten the welfare of her naïve hope.

With a fire prong she poked what was left of the ash

And ignored the choreographed performance of the television.

She’s blissful behind her opaque glass.

Alone, she can imagine a world of rainbows beyond her window.



When the outside unfogs in her window,

Making the leftover ash of winter’s snow visible through the glass,

Her one hope is that she was told wrong by the television.
 
Back
Top