RE: \"And Oh\' Id like to get to know you too\"!, Interview;Albert Einstine coming to America.
Each station of the Earth's setting is an event for a period of something like one hundred thousand years.
This is the amount of processional orbits, that Earth makes around the sun, as a timed event.
After so many years pass in the thousands, there is a time event lock, that is placed on traveling back further than the supposed one hundred thousand years time.
This is as there is no actual record of Earth being within your intended travelback time quest, if the time you choose to travel back to?
So this proposed passage is considered, out of the event processional log of events!?
To go back out of event processionial logged events, you need a really powerfull type of time machine, "which is also almost a type of space craft".
Under the one hundred thousand year mark, yes then most types of time machines will do this.
In order to use any kind of time machine placed omn Earth, that travels backwards or fowards within time, one must install a greavity sensor, which can detect the mass of the Earth.
If one does not have this needed insturment placed within their time travel vessel, then rematerialization within the air, going to a past time, or rematerilaization into solid rock within the future, would be the end result of your quest.
The timed processional movement of Earth is of paramont inportants here, as traveling within time, is a out of phase event, of what is considered normal timespace event passage.
All light is as we percieve it, is a photonic energy pressure, which illuminates, as we humans realize this presence to be, within your reality of reference?
The speed of light within space is faster than the speed of light placed upon Earth.
However because the universe is constantly creating and destroying itself, all space anywhere is considered within movement.
So, realizing that the universe is one big movment, then relagates the speed of light, more commonly known as C, to relativism, or light sectored to points A, then to B. as a relative passage of light.
The need to speed towards the the top end of C, in order to diminish the passage of time for man, is really not needed.
One must understand that mass effected upon by relative qualities within the universe, makes mass, time.mass, so therefor mass within the context of timemass, may respond to other factors, to slow time, as we percieve this passage to be only.
Relative planes to a black hole may be one device in which to slow down time as we percieve it.
However, realize that time and space is so indeed a fabric and if a fabric has a weave to it, then would there not within your own mind, another way to traverse points note as A, to B. other than velocity?
The encrochment of velocity, or VM, towards ^ of C shows slowing due to the factors of time mass compactions as imposed by the Lorentz Contraction.
This is where Mass as accelearited within modified space, or Mass plus, so requires an infinate amout of power, or E, in order to drive M to the top level of C within M+, or stringed space.
This can not be done without disgennising the mass that your trying to accelerate.
This paradox is simply like having to turn off the stage lights for the High school auditorium and so the student stage crew rushes madly down two sets of halls, in order to gain access to the set of controls which will douse the stage lights.
Please note that while these students are madly rushing pal'mal down the halls, trying to keep from crashing into class doorknobs and trash cans.. another student simply parts the stage curtain walks through to the other side of the stage, so parting another set of stage curtans, so reaching the room way before the student malstom within the halls.
Is VM toward ^ of C better?, or is > squew of M+ via whatever method a better approch?
Which is better within your mind?
Thank you, refernce first treste relativity paper A. Einstein, from observations derived from De'Sitter mathamatician and Lowel as well as other astronamers before for the 1908 paper.
