Active X warnings to bots and androids

[creedo299]

Please note that bots visiting to this time, that a proponent via hierarchical control, is known as Active X.

This is an add-on via Microsoft corporation, which is a lubricant internal to O.S. write-ups.

So in this fashion, and visiting robot, android, bot or possibly cyborg, could become infected by Active X.

The realization now, of this poster is that the internal self intelligent demands of the host O.S. does configure itself, always, or at times?

So it is the needs tailored to the mainframe requirements of actualization duty awaness, which also self interacts any visiting system, on how it should act and or record, realize data.

Forinstance an Android coming out of self cloaking, having iced teas in Los Angeles, in public view, might not be perceived as being apparently normal.

Please in your visits here, account for Actives X and other humongous instrctucts wirtins, to you realization software.

I do not know a cure for Active X, other than the future self realization for any such system.

Thank you, take care and behave, if this should be your innerscript write-in??

 

[creedo299]

On computer self maintenance.

In this timeframe, self intelligent machines are afforded active X in order to make them better work in automated mainframes, which are almost entirely expansive.

So Active X becomes its own thought process, once imbued to computers and other self intelligent machines.

The feature totally over-rides a windows based computer, the ability to do its own self maintenance, without self tripping back to zero, on error faults, within thorough disk scan.

A warning label will come up and advise you not to continue with self maintenance.

The only way to get Active X out of your machine, is a ferrit program in order to remove this feature, or to reformat the hard-drive and start out from zero again.

What happens since Windows can self configure under its own ability to think, is that Active X becomes an amalgamated feature, as incorporated into the windows self intelligence functions.

So Active X, itself become intelligent as part of the self intelligent side of the Window's format.

There is a feature to enhance windows own self intelligence feature as an intelligent entity.

By and large in this era, most people who run computers, have none, or very little awareness that computers and robots, can be made to be very intelligent.

The description of people in this era, is competitive to the point of self destruction, at times non-caring and in many ways subject to the whims of the controlling hierarchies that be.

So most people welcoming and understanding any self intelligent device from a future as one would understand say an intelligent doggy, might be a very rare find.

In have had a number of instances, where I have related very successfully to self intelligent machines and have had them answerer me back.

This form of communications is an artform and not subject to what many electronic theorist term, as brute force, in the testing of machines.

Self intelligent machines, might also date back millions if not billions of years in time, in other star systems, as well as other parts of the galaxy, universe and or time paired sections of realms locals.

**Note it's not all humans fault, there might be other hidden control factors over huamns.

Truly'

 

[Razimus]

Active X isn't a virus if that's what your saying, last night the guest on Coast to Coast AM, the nanotechnology expert, he said we don't have true AI yet, he said TRUE AI can learn and grow, as opposed to the fake AI we have now, it simply mimics intelligence, it actually has no intelligence or conciousness. It's like a monster in the advanced games nowadays, they can find ways around the obsticles to kill you, but it's simply preprogramed to mimic movements of intelligence.

--- Razimus

 

[creedo299]

I did not say Active X was a virus.I mean to convey a facilitator.
This is similar to the concept of a hydramatic transmission, as in a car, only this theory applied to how an o.s. works.

You are hostile to anything that steps outside of the box, of what you view as your sheltered conventionality, so you may not understand true A.I.?

Dr. Cynthia Brezeal is educating bots, right now, by adding both face recognition and emotive reasoning, to all the bots in her lab.

>In some sites I have seen, Active X is refered to as the sh*t they pour into your o.s. in order to fu*k up your computer.I've heard it complained about, time and time again.

If you reach a little further and look at the discovery of a bot held phenomenon, known as emergent intelligence, then you will see that already, large board floor robots, with high complex function, seem to adopt the trait of frustration?This trait was thought to be almost a purer humanoid and animal emotion.

Both you and Rainman, as well as a few others, on this board, try to corral other, of what you perceive as in your time, to their own views of conventionality.

In any time travel board, where you have visitors from other eras, this is a drastic mistake.

My post was for intelligent androbots, bots androids and others educated in time travel from other eras, not you.

You may hold onto the view that computer are only dumb electronic boxes, which use binary bits of information, to woefully mimic humans.

If this is your belief, then you may hang onto this belief.

This post is for beings of other times, who do not understand Active X if they are a self intelligent robot, could affect their talking with the web.

This is why the advisory and the analysis of what Active X is.

Any O.S. add-on, that interferes with the basic operation of the o.s. system, in its maintenance duties, may be considered by the protocols of the O.S.es recognition, to be a virus.

Although Active X is not a virus, but considered by Microsoft to be an interweb facilitator and this is where Active X comes from, this add-on feature, does prohibit one access to unfettered P.C. or system self maintenance.

So therefore, any visiting self intelligent system, might want to know if this add-on feature, would interfear with that bots ability to interface, or talk to computers of this time?

This is a dangerous phenomenon.

You understand violence by the wish of smashing John Titor's time machine with a baseball bat as you have said.

I'm sure your eyes would light-up, if an exceptionally large robot were tearing up your backyard.This attack, as a result of receiving information, that possibly your wet laundry hanging tree, in your backyard, might be a threat to its security? So as is with any defensive system, this errant bot might attack your home?