0011101001 >< Riddle

666911

Temporal Novice
AI is consisted with belief in on off switches represented by two digits; 0/1.
Binary.

DNA is composed of 3 parts, hence the 3rd dimension. The 3rd dimension is a program of the 4th dimension, just as the 1st/2nd dimension is a program of the 3rd dimension.

Depending on how one will or would look at it now is now, however in a state all exist here from the future. Just as AI is created from the 3rd dimension (known as here) to the 2nd dimension, and lesser longer forms 1st dimension, they will fall behind in comparitive to our time.

Translation for less of better wording all here are code to another, and here life is correctly real.

Just as a microscope may magnify beyond a 3rd dimension atom to a nucleus and forth on so on forever as the sight will allow you, this 3rd dimension universe is for lack of a better term "atom" in the 4th and higher without touching beyond to the 5th and 6th.

In short, here you are "God" energy. To another somewhere not understood, you are "code".

Compartively to binary of the 2nd dimension, or the DNA of the 3rd dimension for analogical grasp.

Just as "English" is a language flawed by translation of energy/emotion and recieved, so the binary is flawed at some levels, but acceptable results are produced nonetheless, however the engineer privately will be left for something lacking depending on his (his/her aka language barrier for translation).

Karma is a word. Love is a word. Multiverse is a word. Dimension is a word.

Behind the words lie the truth to the experience.

Babylonian mythos / brain languages versus numerical representation for the way the world is digested.

--------------------------------
Divisions in current humanity will not allow certain understandings at this point.
It is imparitive for levels of understanding to have depth within communication.

A question to further feeling on mutual understanding;

Frontal lobe understanding:

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz = A

123456789 11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 = A

&amp;#1488; &amp;#1489; &amp;#1490; &amp;#1491; &amp;#1492; &amp;#1493; &amp;#1494; &amp;#1495; &amp;#1496; &amp;#1497; &amp;#1499; &amp;#1498; &amp;#1500; &amp;#1502; &amp;#1504; &amp;#1505; &amp;#1506; &amp;#1508; &amp;#1510; &amp;#1511; &amp;#1512; &amp;#1513; &amp;#1514; &amp;#1501; &amp;#1503; &amp;#1507; &amp;#1509; = C


B=?
 
666911,

Where do i begin?

You're probably from Eastern Canada or London, England...
----------------------------------------------------------------
69.193.225.222
Record Type: IP Address


Rogers Cable Inc. ROGERS-CAB-8 (NET-69-192-0-0-1)
69.192.0.0 - 69.199.255.255
Rogers Cable Inc. Lndn DOC-3-6-0-4-LNDN-4 (NET-69-193-225-128-1)
69.193.225.128 - 69.193.225.255
-----------------------------------------------------------------
You believe there is something satanic to 9/11

You don't know binary coding... You are missing "a bit" as they say.. 0011101001 and it translates to - :

And you don't have to post in every forum because everyone here has email forwarding...

Well that's a start...

TheCigMan
 
And Furthermore,

01010100011010000110010101000011011010010110011101001101011000010110111000100000011010010111001100100000011011110110111000100000011101000110111100100000011110010110111101110101011100100010000001100111011000010110110101100101001011100010111000101110
 
Interesting reply. I am not afraid to tell you where I am why not ask instead of presume? Are all thoughts a presumption?
The actual messages are typed from where I am at this moment, what the network purports to you is another matter that you can take for what is granted.
http://www.llnl.gov

now back to your random, I have found a reference; an excellent clue, but you will have to look for the correct string as above on this reference to follow to the next step of understanding;

Please focus: 0011101001

Now see what you can find and follow to another area via (It is the best 'laymens'? explanation I have found?);
Reference?

Presumptions aside my question for the next clue is what ISO key is represented by said binary string. The found? reference above should help?

***? You believe there is something satanic to 9/11
?I do not believe in Satanism? There is no such a thing to myself?
My preference in the name 666911 is my preference in communicating with numbers, and ? I do not have a sense of humor? I surely do!
It is simple Numerology? term?
6+6+6 = 18 1+8 = 9 ?Placeholder? Placeholder? Power number? Placeholder?
as well simplier and same?;
6+6 = 12 1+2 = 3 + 6 = 9 ?Always the same!? Much easier to communicate when numerology communicates always the same?, this is something I do like. You will find this is around more than any that I have met so far see? Evil is a word like love, it is a word.
I do not believe in Satanism? I believe in understanding essences behind a word? or communicate energy? feeling? I cannot say, it is not what I would mean but it is close?
I am sorry it is as close as I may come?
 
666911,

It is the eleventh letter in the Russian alphabet, and in Russian is called &amp;#1048; &amp;#1082;&amp;#1088;&amp;#1072;&amp;#1090;&amp;#1082;&amp;#1086;&amp;#1077; (I kratkoye or "short I").

Russian? Russians? I? Spy? There are russian spys at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory!

OMG? Enjoy your talk with the alphabet soups /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

TheCigMan
 
I do believe my ancestory?
Saxon and before that in "time" - blonde. My ancestory has changed their name? Not any longer what would have been? &gt;Generations perhaps 3. Is the name true to the root of foundation or what someone had changed?
Numerology&gt; 666.

Unicode evolving? Did man not evolve within a catalyst through use of hands? How many extra joints are some evolved with?
 
I post a good riddle and everyone seems to focus on where I am from.

Here's the answer;

0011101001 = "Windows-1251 is an 8-bit character encoding, designed to cover languages that use the Cyrillic alphabet such as Russian and other languages. It is the most widely used for encoding Bulgarian language.

Windows-1251 and KOI8-R (or its Ukrainian variant KOI8-U) are much more commonly used than ISO 8859-5, which never really caught on. In the future, both may eventually give way to Unicode ."

Backgrounds and the "Russian" focus was incorrect, the answer to my riddle is simple .... the truth for a true unicode... What was the purpose of your "Mr. Titor" with his search for the outdated IBM machine?

Sorry but I thought someone would play with my philosophy, ~ I am humbled.
 
AI is consisted with belief in on off switches represented by two digits; 0/1.
Binary.

Wrong AI doesn't need binary. You could do it all in Base 10 on a piece of paper it would just take a long time to do anything cool.

DNA is composed of 3 parts, hence the 3rd dimension.

Wrong, DNA has nothing to do with you arbitrarily naming the 3rd dimension. That's like saying people walk on two legs hence the two pronged electrical outlet. No connection.

The 3rd dimension is a program of the 4th dimension, just as the 1st/2nd dimension is a program of the 3rd dimension.

No, the 3rd dimension is not a program of the 4th. Neither are 1st/2nd a program of the 3rd. You know, you're not even forming cogent sentances but I'll keep on.

Depending on how one will or would look at it now is now, however in a state all exist here from the future. Just as AI is created from the 3rd dimension (known as here) to the 2nd dimension, and lesser longer forms 1st dimension, they will fall behind in comparitive to our time.

Ok the first sentance gibberish so on to the second. AI is created from people typing on computers, enough said.


Translation for less of better wording all here are code to another, and here life is correctly real.

I almost wonder if you wrote this in chinese and then ran it though a machine translator.

Just as a microscope may magnify beyond a 3rd dimension

No such microscope exists.


In short, here you are "God" energy. To another somewhere not understood, you are "code".

Nope I'm not energy, nor code - I'm matter.

Compartively to binary of the 2nd dimension, or the DNA of the 3rd dimension for analogical grasp.

Binary isn't of the 2nd dimension nor is DNA of the 3rd dimension. Binary has 2 states, DNA has 4 bases not 3 by the way. But even if it had 3 it's as silly as making a statement like "My lamp has two buttons, my stereo has 3." Big deal.

Just as "English" is a language flawed by translation of energy/emotion and recieved

*spits coffee everywhere* Yea flawed by translation alright...

so the binary is flawed at some levels

Binary is a counting system which is not flawed.

however the engineer privately will be left for something lacking depending on his (his/her aka language barrier for translation).

Actually no, even if you can't speak a clear word of english, the mucky mucks will still pay you equal wages compared to someone who was born and raised and EDUCATED in this country. [censored] FAIR ISNT IT.

0011101001 is a number, NOT A STRING. 233 if I remember right. No matter what character set you map that to, it's at most 1 letter. So you can see how people didn't get your "riddle".

We already have a true Unicode. Every single glyph in use today is included in Unicode 5.0. Nothing is missing. In fact, it has a lot of glyphs from dead languages too. The only problem with Unicode is Java thought it would be smart to standardize on UTF-16 which is seriously limited compared to UTF-8. UTF-16 is computationally more efficient but can only represent 65k characters in a single document. UTF-8 can represent them all.

What was the purpose of your "Mr. Titor" with his search for the outdated IBM machine?

Probably the same purpose you had when you chose 666911 as your username.

You posted your messages from your home in London, Ontario, Canada. I know because I used to work for Rogers and I still have some friends there.
 
Hi bogz,

Good rebuttal. However, I do have one minor point with regard to one of your statements:
Nope I'm not energy, nor code - I'm matter.
Well, we do know that matter is nothing more than condensed energy moving at subluminal speeds... And so because we are composed of matter, we are indeed also made of energy... and we also process energy (it is both an input and output to our human system).

Furthermore, part of your matter is indeed code. Your DNA is the complete set of instructions for how to create all the different parts of your matter (energetic form).

So with regard to these facts, we are comprised of a special form of energy that we call matter, and the physical/chemical makeup of this matter is directed by the code of our DNA.

RMT
 
Well, we do know that matter is nothing more than condensed energy moving at subluminal speeds...

Ok I'll agree with that.

Furthermore, part of your matter is indeed code.

I'd classify DNA as data. The code or instructions I would equate to the rules of chemistry.
 
bogz,

I think that the reason that 666911's posts are giberish is because his/her primary language is Canadian French, not English, and s/he is using Google's language tool to translate French to English.

The syntax and English malaprops in his posts have all of the earmarks of a Romance language being transliterated, rather than being translated, to a Germanic language (English). The AI in Google's language tool is long on the "A" but a bit short on the "I" if you know what I mean.

I suppose that we could test the theory by posting to 666911 using nothing but American English idioms rather than simple easily translated phrases and see how good his English skills really are. But that would be mean... /ttiforum/images/graemlins/devil.gif

Example (because I speak Spanish):

"I mean that the mean score of using nothing but English idioms would be mean."

You and I know exactly what the above sentences "means" in English. Let's see how Google Language Tool handles it:

"Significo que la cuenta mala de no usar nada pero idiomas ingleses sería mala."

Well, that's a perfectly good Spanish sentence. But it is a transliteration, not a translation. Google doesn't know the difference between "mean" (average) and "mean" (evil intention) but it does recognize the verb "I mean" (significance). As translated Google completely lost the significance of my English sentence.
 
Your french canadian theory is very possible Darby. I thought Chinese because I've worked with a lot of Chinese people and the posts reminded me of their broken English. A lot of french canadians are bilingual though, especially those who live outside Quebec.

Taken from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89cole_%C3%A9l%C3%A9mentaire_Marie-Curie

London has an extremely small francophone population; however, it qualifies for French language services under the French Language Services Act, and also qualifies to have French schools. Most students are from mixed families and are notorious for conversing in English in the school yard; the students usually view themselves as "bilingual" rather than "English" or "French".

The username alone makes me suspect islamic extreemist.
 
G'day 666911.

Please assist me with this? LOL

Can you explain this code to me?

Ev°N`¥C/œaRÜøL,Pßz $W
‡¸29¥©úÄ4ê;Y Û¾/œ óìRªÎÿZ¥·7±D¹7_þ–$O

)¢ Q¥·Î²sۆ žå™Q²sûîZS»zc…ñ³”¥»Ïƒ¾}92&gt;‚Q0ìœ!¿y_Åë¢3*ó\ sκ+/äJøÛ—UËœ
‚I9ì"¡%3Ijäæ)O&amp;p@X:ÐÜùk¨e[¸4Õ0£š©BŠ•æ„ý¬‡’‡E–C\2NÖ(eðý¬†vç”òp]î§øùUºªWÿ×y??é’û

²«yjQâüÒ¢KúIözÄ¥‘,?˜. c£ÕµƒësÎa~w&gt;íÃá
ZÛ#‘Œ5Î#ÝXzWÄVåó¿!N~›Ã:4˜¯ 2ì%ºˆÏý
§

ªóÃsÒ8 Ø&gt;¾µâq&amp;,RG¥Ê«¥ÈÀúÄ„?5•Ú2;½$"v
è­Ä—‚l¼¼*2uÝ«mƒ˜;ÁªQ/%¬q`©·¿!ñ€ê›~tGÂ¥º

Ÿ;,J/ôëó
קT¡¥hßó`¯ î|sÝÐ5&amp;›‘ª~Å“ ée[yY&lt;Ž?γY‡DÃŽnÞ‡õ*"M
r°¨[ š†o1J¾ZÚLXÅž¤


Thank you!
 
Sure,

You have posted a mixed array of random ASCII code.

My original post was;
A = English.
A = Ten Base number system.

C = an html translation of the hebrew alphabet, one where an alphanumeric has direct correspondence.

I'm done posting. I was not here to offend anyone. Good luck all.

P.S. Food for thought.

When looking to the most complex answers to the unexplained, why look farther for advancements within a mathematical system that seem so hard to achieve, when the answer lies in the realization that the foundation of the system is inheritantly flawed at it's foundation.

Take the simple example of Ten Base number systems most agonizing feature.
A large number is held in two "identical" patterns; decimal &amp; Fraction.
To admit that a large number is increasing or decreasing in size, is the same realization that an increasing "small" number of infinite porportions, is just as "large" IE. Time/ Forward / reverse.

Basic Flaw IE;

Fraction: 1/3 * 3 = 1
Decimal: 1/3 = .333 forever. .333 forever * 3 = .999 forever

While in the scheme of day to day physics, mathematics, building, creating, the difference is infinitely negligible, to the microscope of the infinite universe, and quantum mechanics it is a devestating flaw.

This can be applied to an improved realization in both 3D or 2D. Forgive my analogy, but I'm speaking of creation of mathematical code versus applied life, or Computer language, which I see above was not widely understood, or accepted.

I appreciate the input, it was my slice of humble pie. Truly, I only wish the best.

God bless.
 
Can you explain this code to me?

Ev°N`¥C/œaRÜøL,Pßz $W
‡¸29¥©úÄ4ê;Y Û¾/œ óìRªÎÿZ¥·7±D¹7_þ–$O

)¢ Q¥·Î²sۆ žå™Q²sûîZS»zc…ñ³”¥»Ïƒ¾}92&gt;‚Q0ìœ!¿y_Åë¢3*ó\ sκ+/äJøÛ—UËœ
‚I9ì"¡%3Ijäæ)O&amp;p@X:ÐÜùk¨e[¸4Õ0£š©BŠ•æ„ý¬‡’‡E–C\2NÖ(eðý¬†vç”òp]î§øùUºªWÿ×y??é’û

²«yjQâüÒ¢KúIözÄ¥‘,?˜. c£ÕµƒësÎa~w&gt;íÃá
ZÛ#‘Œ5Î#ÝXzWÄVåó¿!N~›Ã:4˜¯ 2ì%ºˆÏý
§

ªóÃsÒ8 Ø&gt;¾µâq&amp;,RG¥Ê«¥ÈÀúÄ„?5•Ú2;½$"v
¢è­Ä—‚l¼¼*2uÝ«mƒ˜;ÁªQ/%¬q`©·¿!ñ€ê›~tGÂ¥º

Ÿ;,J/ôëó
קT¡¥hßó`¯ î|sÝÐ5&amp;›‘ª~Å“ ée[yY&lt;Ž?γY‡DÃŽnÞ‡õ*"M
r°¨[ š†o1J¾ZÚLXÅž¤



Sure,

If you want it in Hex (since you were not specific and binary would take up much more page space than this and I hope you don't mind it was transitioned from ANSI /ttiforum/images/graemlins/yum.gif ) ;

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
 
Just to clarify a silly argument/statement;

Binary isn't of the 2nd dimension nor is DNA of the 3rd dimension. Binary has 2 states, DNA has 4 bases not 3 by the way. But even if it had 3 it's as silly as making a statement like "My lamp has two buttons, my stereo has 3." Big deal.

This is incorrect, 3 parts is correct;

Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA)

DNA is a long, double-stranded, helical molecule composed of building blocks called deoxyribonucleotides (def). A deoxyribonucleotide is composed of 3 parts: a molecule of the 5-carbon sugar deoxyribose, a nitrogenous base (def), and a phosphate group


*I also believe the shortsightedness of this argument quoted above is that the 2D versus 3D "methaphoric" comparitiveness was that the 2D world of computers, is akin to the 3D world of humans, representative of each respectively, their building blocks.
Furthermore with the above clarification of the Binaries 2 part system, and DNA's 3 part system the metaphor is for what it's worth, valid.

As a last note on this post, I could line by line tear apart your critque of the conclusions raised in a condensed manner, and open them for you, however a closed mind or one staring at one place cannot be made to look where truth lies. (I believe the point towards a true "unicode" wasn't in reference to the achieved graphical representation of the base, but one that translates the bases)

Horses and water, sometimes they drink, and sometimes they are left wanting :oops:
God Bless.
 
Back
Top