Jump to content



Recommended Posts

I believe anything is possible. I also believe that we, as humans, are thinking to small. One thing that scientists don't do is think outside the box. We have limited ourselves to what we can explain.


If you think about it, everything we know to be true could be the exact opposite on another world. The factors are amazing when you think about them. A simple change in axis could change the way gravity works. Also, other planets may be smaller or bigger which means the gravity and air (depending on aptmosphere) could be different.


There are so many things out there that we cannot explain because we are assuming how it works off thoeries. This will not do. Too many people take thoeries as fact and leave it at that. We all have thoeries, but they could all be wrong.


I've thought long and hard about the possibilities of time travel and how it could happen. I've also thought that it's possible that the UFO's that we see, could possibly be our future race coming back to see us and study their past. You never know. The best thing we could do right now is open up our minds to ALL of the possibilities. Remembering that nothing is impossible and everything is possible.


There's an old saying, "Whatever go's up, must come down". Even I know that is not true. Hubble went up, and I don't see it down. One thrust and hubble is floating forever. What I am getting at here is that sayings such as that, can be proven wrong simply by thinking bigger. "Whatever go's up, must come down", is something that was said before we had space travel. Once we had space travel, we knew that not to be true.


Is it that we need help to see the big picture? Don't limit what you think about to thoeries and fact, open your mind to your own thoeries and explorations. Don't believe everything someone says based on the fact that they have a Ph. D. I even know that everyone is tought differently, by different teachers and in different ways. Everyone has their own way of doing things and if we try to follow those people, we get lost. Think for yourself.


Time Travel:


possibility: Black Hole. The thoery states that we would be torn apart by entering one. How do they know that? Calculations? Maybe they are just express highways through the universe. We just don't know. I'll go in and see. How's that?



Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure. I mean, if all the numbers tell me I'm going to be crushed into oblivion, I certaintly wouldn't want to be the first to try it out.


I do understand what you're saying though. It's likely that alot of our current theories are going to be proven wrong eventually, if the past is any indication.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is perhaps much more than meets the i.e. "Public Eye" as for what's really going on in those underground labs, all nicely tucked away from the press, or Acadamia, after all, most of what is to become commonly accepted by any oficiated statements to the media, or what later becomes accepted by scientific communities, is generally channeled through the academic structure, and latter published in academic journals & liturature, while gaining attention through various otlets of the media.


Perhaps this might explain as to why many research that has already gained many results to provide evidence in support of Time~Travel, or other concepts, it lacks the common elements of exposure through the channels that give it clarity of recognization & worldwide acceptance as being no longer something of whimsical fantasies belonging to overated sci-fi fans.


here is just one example...




CONTROL http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/element115.html


Element 115, the key to understanding how the ultra-secret "Black


World" has created aircraft capable of manipulating gravity and


space/time, has been identified, and the recent discovery of element


118, which decayed into element 114, further helps identify the




The most important attribute of this heavier, stable element is that


the gravity A wave is so abundant that it actually extends past the


perimeter of the atom. These heavier, stable elements literally have


their own gravity A field around them, in addition to the gravity B


field that is native to all matter.


The Key To Gravity-Control Systems


No naturally occurring atoms on earth have enough protons and


neutrons for the cumulative gravity A wave to extend past the


perimeter of the atom so you can access it. Now even though the


distance that the gravity A wave extends past the perimeter of the


atom is infinitesimal, it is accessible and it has amplitude, wave


length, and frequency, just like any other wave in the


electromagnetic spectrum. Once you can access the gravity A wave, you


can amplify it just like we amplify other electromagnetic waves.


And in like manner, the gravity A wave is amplified and then focused


on the desired destination to cause the space/time distortion


required for practical space travel.


This amplified gravity A wave is so powerful that the only naturally


occurring source of gravity that could cause space/time to distort


this much would be a black hole.


We're amplifying a wave that barely extends past the perimeter of an


atom until it's large enough to distort vast amounts of space/time.




We synthesize heavier, unstable elements by using more stable


elements as targets in a particle accelerator. We then bombard the


target element with various atomic and sub-atomic particles. By doing


this, we actually force neutrons into the nucleus of the atom and in


some cases merge two dissimilar nuclei together. At this point,


transmutation occurs, making the target element a different, heavier




As an example, in the early 80's, the lab for heavy ion research in


Darmshtot, Germany synthesized some element 109 by bombarding Bismuth


203 with Iron 59. And to show you how difficult it is to do this,


they had to bombard the target element for a week to synthesize 1


atom of element 109. And on that subject, this same lab has projected


that in the future they should be able to bombard Curium 248 with


with Calcium 48 to yield element 116 which will then decay through a


series of nuclides which are unknown to them, but are well known to


the scientists at S4 located within the complex of the Groom


Lake "Area 51" installation.


The length of time which an element exists before it decays


determines its stability. Atoms of some elements decay faster than


atoms of other elements, so the faster an element decays, the more


unstable that element is considered to be. When an atom decays, it


releases or radiates sub-atomic particles and energy, which is the


radiation that a Geiger counter detects.


Alien Craft


The reactor found in the alien craft at S4, as widely mentioned by


physicist Robert Lazar is primarily based on a superheavy element


with an atomic number of 115. Element 115 will be designated


as "Ununpentium" according to IUPAC guidelines. Its periodic


designation and electron configuration appear in the diagram at the


top of the page.


The collision of lead and krypton leads to the new elements.


BBC News Online Science Editor Dr David Whitehouse


Two new "superheavy" elements have been made by bombarding lead atoms


with energy-packed krypton atoms at the rate of two trillion per




After 11 days, the scientists working at the Lawrence Berkeley


National Laboratory, US, had produced just three atoms of element


118. These contained 118 protons and 175 neutrons each in their




The new elements decayed almost instantly to element 116, which


itself was short-lived. But, for that brief moment, they were the


only three atoms of these elements ever to have existed on Earth.


Ken Gregorich, the nuclear chemist who led the discovery team,


said: "Our unexpected success in producing these superheavy elements


opens up a whole world of possibilities using similar reactions: new


elements and isotopes."


US Secretary of Energy, Bill Richardson, commented: "This stunning


discovery opens the door to further insights into the structure of


the atomic nucleus."


Unstable combination


Atoms consist of a central nucleus surrounded by a cloud of


electrons. The nucleus consists of protons and neutrons.


But not all combinations of neutrons and protons are stable. In


nature, no element heavier than uranium, with 92 protons and 146


neutrons, can normally be found.


Scientists can make heavier ones by colliding two large nuclei


together and hoping that they will form a new, heavier nucleus for a


short time.


One of the most significant aspects of the new elements is that their


decay sequence is consistent with theories that predict an "island of


stability" for atoms containing approximately 114 protons and 184




"We jumped over a sea of instability onto an island of stability that


theories have been predicting since the 1970s," said nuclear


physicist Victor Ninov. He is the first author of a paper on the


discovery submitted to Physical Review Letters journal.


Atomic structure


Synthetic elements are often short-lived, but provide scientists with


valuable insights into the structure of atomic nuclei. They also


offer opportunities to study the chemical properties of the elements


heavier than uranium.


I-Yang Lee, scientific director of the atom smasher at Lawrence


Berkeley National Laboratory, said "From the discovery of these two


new superheavy elements, it is now clear that the island of stability


can be reached.


"Additionally, similar reactions can be used to produce other


elements and isotopes, providing a rich new region for the study of


nuclear properties."


Fast work


Element 118 takes less than a thousandth of a second to decay by


emitting an alpha particle. This leaves behind an isotope of element


116 which contains 116 protons and 173 neutrons.


This daughter is also radioactive, alpha-decaying to an isotope of


element 114.


The chain of successive alpha decays continues until at least element





Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Time on our side"


From:] New Scientist Magazine Website... http://www.newscientist.com/ns/19991030/letters7.html


Julian Barbour isn't the only one who thinks time is an illusion (16


October, p 29). He has distinguished predecessors.


(Julian Barbour is an independent theoretical physicist who lives


near Oxford.)




Julian Barbour's The End of Time is published by Weidenfeld &




"Time" Our minisite produced in collaboration with the National


Physical Laboratory, the UK's National Standards Laboratory.


Website:] http://www.newscientist.com/nsplus/insight/time/time.html


Parmenides (540 BC) said: "The true world is one of permanence.


Change is also an illusion."


Plato said: "Time is a mental impression to which nothing in the real


world corresponds."


Einstein said: "For us physicists the distinction between past,


present and future signifies only an obstinate illusion."


The above were supplied to me a few years ago--after a discussion in


which I proposed that time was illusory--by Peter Landsberg of the


University of Southampton maths department, who wrote The Enigma of


Time (Adam Hilger, 1982). As we seem to be having difficulty


understanding this concept more than 2500 years after it was first


noted, I decided to study photonic crystals instead.




University of Southampton


I am fascinated to learn from Barbour's article that we may "soon" be


able to prove the non-existence of time. It would be good to know


roughly "when" this might happen, so I can work as much overtime as


possible while the concept is still valid.




[email redacted]


next letter


From New Scientist, 30 October 1999


Additional Sources...


The Quantum Inquisition °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° http://www.newscientist.com/ns/19991030/thequantum.html


Entangled photons could provide deep insights into our world that


nobody, not even physicists, expected. Michael Brooks spoke to the


chief inquisitor AFTER BATTLING THE STRANGENESS of time and space...




The Serpent in the Garden of Sentience... http://members.aol.com/chaque/time/time.htm


(More to come latter.)......





Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...