Jump to content

Hey Rainman!!!!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Re: Freudian

 

Is that the best psychology majors can do now a days?

 

Perhaps you spent too much time partying in college, and less time taking the profession seriously.

 

Pretty pathetic if you ask me. You were being counted on for something 'smart' and enlightening, not this cheap attack. But hey, I guess that is the best you and Ray can do against the TTA ;).

 

TTA

 

 

"For what was, for what is, and for what will be, I will still continue to fight for its preservation, always!" ~TTA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Yes, Freud, Yes....

 

Rich with double-entendre! But I'll bet the play on the word "fit" in that pic may have slipped-by our self-educated friend. And how funny that the he calls for something "deep" while not seeing just how DEEP that pic is!

 

I have to be fair to you, Freud, and let you know at the outset: You see, TTA is special. No, not special in THAT way! The TTA is a legend, you see. (Or at least that is what he wishes people would believe). And as we know, with a legend there is just no winning. The people (or is that Peepo?) will rise-up and crush anyone who attempts to soil their legends.

 

We must be cautious, Master.... one can feel the power of the Dark Side.

 

RMT

 

 

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Your threats here, just like in the PM's, have been noted Ray.

 

You see, TTA is special. No, not special in THAT way! The TTA is a legend, you see. (Or at least that is what he wishes people would believe).

Oh please, spare me your green jealousy for the TTA being labeled a "legend," so I gotta take a stab at him approach. You still have not refuted a single fact I have stated... so much for calling me a liar!

 

Mr. TT Hunter, a.k.a. Spinmaster, who is always asking his victims for proof of their claims, cannot do it himself, so he has to be annoying & immature when it's him taking the hot seat.

 

And as we know, with a legend there is just no winning. The people (or is that Peepo?) will rise-up and crush anyone who attempts to soil their legends.

Are you kidding me? That's you to a "T" RMT. If anyone rises-up, to crush anyone on this forum, it's you and your people Ray. As evident here.

 

2 against 1.

 

I guess you like to go hunting with a buddy :).

 

We must be cautious, Master.... one can feel the power of the Dark Side.

With all facades aside Ray, we both know who's really on the Dark Side here. It's obvious who is constantly having to assert his power and strength over people on this forum. And as much as you want to play this angle against me, you can only spin history so much, until it becomes crystal clear obvious to the rest of us, that that someone, is full of B.S.

 

TTA

 

 

"For what was, for what is, and for what will be, I will still continue to fight for its preservation, always!" ~TTA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Ive read in other threads you claim to be a debunker but you are harping on RMT because he asks for evidence. Explain that please.

 

You did proclaim on this board that you and Pam were legendary. Pam I have heard of...

 

Thankyou John's parents!!

 

That means John made it ok!!! I was so worried!

 

Alright John!

 

John, If you are reading this in the future....

 

THANKYOU!! THANKYOU!!! THANKYOU!!!

 

I will treasure it always.

 

smileys for you.............. x100

 

Darby is well known too because of Titor.

 

TTA on the other hand, I have NEVER heard of before. And honestly, what are you trying to accomplish referencing yourself in the 3rd person?

 

Can you provide any evidence you are actually a debunker?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Greeting Bogz,

 

Ive read in other threads you claim to be a debunker but you are harping on RMT because he asks for evidence. Explain that please.

You want to know why I am harping on RMT because he asks for evidence? And to explain this to you?

 

Please read over this thread one more time, if it's not entirly clear to you yet what is going on.

 

You did proclaim on this board that you and Pam were legendary.

I may have said it... but I did not proclaim that I was!

 

Read a little closer... I said this:

 

I know you are just you, and I am just me too. But on this internet forum, we are playing a role, for we are crucial characters (legendary characters at that) deeply involved in this grand play that one named John Titor began over 6 years ago. Or at least that's what many seem to believe in some way or another.

You said:

 

TTA on the other hand, I have NEVER heard of before. And honestly, what are you trying to accomplish referencing yourself in the 3rd person?

You must of been living under a rock. Check out: The Dual Language Diagnosis of John Titor

 

Can you provide any evidence you are actually a debunker?

I'm surprised you didn't find any, looking through all those threads ;).

 

But I don't believe, I've ever called my self a debunker.

 

You can just call me the TimeTravelActivist.

 

TTA

 

 

"For what was, for what is, and for what will be, I will still continue to fight for its preservation, always!" ~TTA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

You want to know why I am harping on RMT because he asks for evidence? And to explain this to you?

 

Please read over this thread one more time, if it's not entirly clear to you yet what is going on.

Sorry I'm too dumb. I need it explained. Why is an activist (as ambiguous as that term is) such as yourself upset when another person asks a claimant for evidence?

 

Or at least that's what many seem to believe in some way or another.

Are you one of the "many" that believe this? You didn't say...

 

You must of been living under a rock. Check out: The Dual Language Diagnosis of John Titor

Oh I read that, I meant that I had never heard of you back when Titor was posting with Pam. That's the only way I would qualify you as "deeply" involved.

 

we chose to become involved in this since day one. And as much as we now wish to have that anonymity back in our lives

 

Never heard of you. Just Pam (sr. supporter) and Darby (sr. debunker).

 

You can just call me the TimeTravelActivist.

 

Maybe it's just bad luck on my part, but every thread I clicked on, including this one, RMT was miding his own business and start trolling. Can I call you TimeTravelTroll?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Sorry I'm too dumb. I need it explained. Why is an activist (as ambiguous as that term is) such as yourself upset when another person asks a claimant for evidence?

Yes, you must be. This isn't the reason at all.

 

RMT can ask any person for evidence to their claims that they make; that is not the problem.

 

The problem Bogz, is that when it comes for RMT to provide the same for his claims that he makes, against anyone, i.e. the TTA. I'm afraid this is where the double standard kicks in, and somehow the same rules don't seem to apply to him.

 

Are you one of the "many" that believe this? You didn't say...

How prespective of you :).

 

No, I'am not one of the "many" that believes this.

 

Oh I read that, I meant that I had never heard of you back when Titor was posting with Pam. That's the only way I would qualify you as "deeply" involved. Never heard of you. Just Pam (sr. supporter) and Darby (sr. debunker).

I've dropped out of posting 4 years ago. Unlike Pam and Darby who stayed behind to continue the discussion on Titor, my involvement was isolated to just a few years.

 

But I personally don't care if you've heard of me or not. I've answered your original question and directed you to the thread. It's not my place to defend to you if I was or wasn't involved. As I could careless about John Titor.

 

Maybe it's just bad luck on my part, but every thread I clicked on, including this one, RMT was miding his own business and start trolling. Can I call you TimeTravelTroll?

Yes, it must be bad luck on your part. RMT minding his own business? Oh yeah right!

 

That's truly a credible fact. But I see he has you to vouch for him though.

 

I am reminded by something that RMT just recently said:

 

And as we know, with a legend there is just no winning. The people (or is that Peepo?) will rise-up and crush anyone who attempts to soil their legends.

Then I said:

 

Are you kidding me? That's you to a "T" RMT. If anyone rises-up, to crush anyone on this forum, it's you and your people Ray. As evident here.

 

2 against 1.

 

I guess you like to go hunting with a buddy :).

RMT, here is your up-rising :), as the TTA predicted.

 

3 against 1... is TimeTravelTroll the best you got Bogz?

 

TTA

 

 

"For what was, for what is, and for what will be, I will still continue to fight for its preservation, always!" ~TTA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Bottom line is, RMT is a real scientist, working on technologies that, if you knew about, he'd have to kill you... and your mother's kittens. You're a dork who believes that some dude named "John Titor" really came back from the future to steal and Atari 2600.

 

Me? I like eggs.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Good Morning, bogz:

 

I do appreciate you setting out some facts in this thread. And of course you know as well as I do that I did not request you to even enter this thread... although some might not believe it. As I warned my friend Freud, I should also let you know that you should not feel obligated to put yourself up against the TTA (the man, the myth, the legend). You've seen his track record since his return, so I don't have to tell you what is in store for anyone who crosses the TTA.

 

Maybe it's just bad luck on my part, but every thread I clicked on, including this one, RMT was miding his own business and start trolling.

Interesting observation. Maybe I should tell you a little story. It might be a boring story, but (like episodes of SouthPark) there is a "message" embedded within this story. Tell me what you think:

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Once upon a Time there were two friends. For sake of reference let's refer to them as Mr. F and Mr. R. Mr. F had not spoken to Mr. R in awhile, and when Mr. F tried to contact Mr. R via their usual form of contact, Mr. F found that he could not reach Mr. R. Mr. F being a crafty and intelligent guy figured out that he could contact Mr. R by posting a thread with Mr. R's handle in the title on an internet forum. Viola, the two friends were back in touch again. But this is not where our story ends... it is just getting started!

 

Suddenly, someone we will call Mr. X barges into this friendly cyber-reunion. Mr. X makes some brash (and unproven) assumptions about what is going on in this thread, and so Mr. X begins to go on a tirade and begins to make accusations about Mr. R. The actions of Mr. X, while puzzling, are also found to be somewhat humorous to Mr. F and Mr. R. Seeing as how Mr. X had burst into their cyber-reunion and was now slinging [self-censored] all over the place, Mr. F and Mr. R decided to have a little fun. Of course, Mr. F and Mr. R knew that their fun was going to wind-up Mr. X to no end. As a result, Mr. F and Mr. R allowed Mr. X to turn this friendly cyber-reunion thread into whatever sort of dark, and evil tool that he wanted in order to proceed with his attack.

 

Now, what Mr. X doesn't realize is that he had entered this thread with an accusation that he did not (and could not) prove or validate in any way. IOW, the premise of Mr. X's tirade has not been established. But Mr. X seemed to think that this did not matter, and so he launched into more allegations against Mr. R... and once again failed to realize that he could not provide definitive (that means not-subject-to-corruption) evidence of the allegations he was making. Mr. R pointed out that he believed Mr. X was engaged in perjury in these unfounded allegations. So now (being a tad unsure in the disciplines of science, logic, and validation) Mr. X begins to demand that Mr. R provide evidence of said perjury... and all the while, Mr. X does not realize that he has never provided definitive evidence that his own, initial allegations were true.

 

But now, instead of trying to go back and validate his own allegation with which he barged into this thread, Mr. X begins an assault on another friend of Mr. R's... let's call him Mr. B. Mr. X attempts to deftly (or so he thinks) shift the tactical offensive in a different direction, and as such he attempts to bring allegations (implied, but allegations nonetheless) of people "ganging up on him". Now what is really ironic (and terribly sly) about this change in tactics is that Mr. X was the one who barged into this friendly thread in the first place and started slinging accusations.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Now you are a smart enough guy, bogz, that I don't have to spell-out the moral of this story, right? So I won't. But I must say, I see some dark clouds forming on the horizon. The forces of Light and Darkness seem to be gearing-up for some kind of epic battle. Such confrontations are rarely pretty, and the outcome would never be considered "positive" for either the forces of Darkness or even those of the Light. But sometimes Darkness has a ceaseless tendency to constantly want to push away Light, and it tirelessly challenges the Light. And so, such epic battles sometimes cannot be avoided.

 

I just hope no one "pushes the button", because it could result in less-than-desireable consequences for not only the powers of Light and Darkness, but also for many innocents who yearn for nothing but peace.

 

RMT

 

 

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Hi Freud,

 

Me? I like eggs.

Me too! Fried, poached, whatever! In fact, I just had an awesome Tex-Mex breakfast enchilada with eggs and chorizo this morning! Yummity, yum yum! :yum:

On a slightly related topic.... is it just me, or is Nigella Lawson one smoking-hot BABE!?!?!?

 

Man would I enjoy fertilizing HER eggs!!! ;)

 

RMT

 

 

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

The problem Bogz, is that when it comes for RMT to provide the same for his claims that he makes, against anyone, i.e. the TTA. I'm afraid this is where the double standard kicks in, and somehow the same rules don't seem to apply to him.

The topic here is Time Travel. RMT asks for evidence of time travel claims. He himself does NOT make claims that he is a time traveler.

 

RMT, here is your up-rising , as the TTA predicted.

You repeatedly attack someone who wants to have serious discussions about the topic on this board and eventually the other people who are serious about wanting to have discussions will tell you to STFU. It has nothing to do with RMT, and EVERYTHING to do with YOU. When you make other predictions with the same difficulty level such as "the sun will rise" tomorrow, do you keep score anywhere?

 

MMmmmm. English Muffin.

 

ps. NINTENDO WII! NINTENDO WII! NINTENDO WII!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pop Tart

 

MMmmmm. English Muffin.

Dude... she is SO hot I can't stand it! Am I wrong here? Do I sound like a stalker? Maybe it's just her striking looks against her dark hair (I love brunettes), and that.... uhhhh.... AMPLE bust?

I thought about inviting her to this year's Titor Bash on 1-JAN, but then I thought better of it. I'm a freakin' Yank, and she doesn't know me from Adam. Plus I understand she is bangin' someone else ever since her first husband took the A train.

 

Maybe OllyB can invite her for me??? I mean, it might make more sense since he is a Brit, and all Brits know each other.... right??? :confused:

 

RMT

 

 

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Freud,

 

Bottom line is, RMT is a real scientist, working on technologies that, if you knew about, he'd have to kill you... and your mother's kittens. You're a dork who believes that some dude named "John Titor" really came back from the future to steal and Atari 2600.

But aren't you a dork for being his lackey and brown nosing?

 

RMT is a big boy, he can take care of himself. Unless of course, you're so full of admiration for the guy, and can do no wrong, then I can understand why you would want to fight his battles for him.

 

TTA

 

 

"For what was, for what is, and for what will be, I will still continue to fight for its preservation, always!" ~TTA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

RMT,

 

I have a boring story to tell too, and in the tradition of your favorite cartoon, this also contains a special message embedded ;). Enjoy!

 

---------------- ---------------- ----------------

 

A long time ago, two rivals met for the first time on an inquisition panel. We shall continue with the same character names as the previous story: Mr. X was invited as a special guest to testify by Mr. D. Once here, he met many new people wanting to ask Mr. X questions. One of which, was Mr. R, who was apparently nominated to interrogate this special guest. Mr. X had no idea who Mr. R was, nor of what was going on, after being out of the loop for 4 years. At first, Mr. R was quite inquisitive of Mr. X, yet later he began to disrespect Mr. X for no apparent reason, and continued to do so, after all attempts of Mr. X to be diplomatic were extinguished.

 

Months later, Mr. R, was attempting to continue on a new interrogation of a 16 year old kid, in much the same disrespectful manner, as he first attempted to question Mr. X, months prior. Mr. X returned, and confronted Mr. R on his inappropriate actions, and a treaty between the two parties was established. And it read: I will not bother you, if you do not bother me.

 

PM's were exchanged back and forth for many months between Mr. R & Mr. X, enjoying a spirited but friendly & peaceful debate on various subjects. However, as Mr. X communicated to Mr. R, that his anti-social approach of innocent people was not necessary, Mr. R continued to explain to Mr. X why he behaved the way he did on certain inquisition panels. Countless PM's were sent to Mr. X, giving Mr. R's rationale, for his behavior. A wedge between these two 'would be friends' was created, and silence fell for many weeks.

 

As Mr. R disregarded Mr. X's advice to 'play nice' Mr. R went on a rampage. Mr. R became a different man for a very long time. Mr. R set his eyes on Mr. C, and went on to attack and ridicule his long time adversary Mr. C. for many weeks. Mr. R attempted to foil Mr. C and make him look foolish. Mr. X intervened, and an indirect way, asked that Mr. C and Mr. R cease these cartoon antics, though not directly naming who started what. In a PM between Mr. R & Mr. X, Mr. R contacted Mr. X, and asked him to recall the treaty that they agreed too many months ago, and to not referrer to Mr. R's handle in any way on any further messages. Mr. X acknowledged Mr. R's request, and created an addendum to this treaty.

 

However, debate and question regarding the guidelines of such a treaty led to conflict between Mr. R & Mr. X. Mr. R, despite requesting that Mr. X leave him alone, he could not do so in turn. Mr. X was very patient and asked Mr. R, if he did not cease and acknowledge the very treaty that he proposed, then they would be back where they began long ago.

 

Mr. R, feeling quite upset to being shown this truth and no way to spin it, Mr. R responded to Mr. X with extreme hostility, threats, and inappropriate profanity, and said that all future PM's would be on ignore.

 

Now, the story continues, with Mr. R, speaking of Mr. X, in the same manner that Mr. R originally requested that Mr. X not do so in turn. Mr. X, now returned to question and shed light on the matter, Mr. R seems to deny Mr. X claims, but has not once refuted a single statement Mr. X has said. Instead, Mr. R, and his friends, gang up on Mr. X, out of ignorance of what really transpired in the prequel to this epic battle, that started long ago!

 

In present time:

 

Darkness spreads over the TTI, coupled by the shady influence of the Dark Emperor of Spin (Mr. R), his only hope now rest in his friends, and to sway the masses, and pin Mr. X, as the one and only undesirable in existence. His influence and intentions, is to divert others from the truth, and create a new truth, a truth of spin. For you see, Mr. R, is embedded with secret hidden intentions, his mathematical model. This force helps propel and influence his every action and decisions, where if ever questioned by others, a justification (spin) is created to explain it away!

 

TTA

 

 

"For what was, for what is, and for what will be, I will still continue to fight for its preservation, always!" ~TTA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Bogz,

 

The topic here is Time Travel. RMT asks for evidence of time travel claims. He himself does NOT make claims that he is a time traveler.

Yeah, you really don't have a clue of what's going on. Do you make it a habit to defend someone without first getting the facts straight? It seems so!

 

You repeatedly attack someone who wants to have serious discussions about the topic on this board and eventually the other people who are serious about wanting to have discussions will tell you to STFU.

What were my attacks?

 

Instead, I would ask that you look closer Bogz. Read your replies to me, Freud's and RMT's.

 

Now those are attacks! Malicious ones!

 

Mine, are truth based, which set the record straight. No threats made, no name calling, no intentional disrespect of anyone.

 

Your definition for attack, needs updating Bogz.

 

It has nothing to do with RMT, and EVERYTHING to do with YOU. When you make other predictions with the same difficulty level such as "the sun will rise" tomorrow, do you keep score anywhere?

So in other words, predicting that someone will come to RMT's aid each time anyone offers to challenge him, is useless, seeing as how that is always going to be the case.

 

Well then, the TTA has no problem in a mix-match battle of epic proportions ;).

 

TTA

 

 

"For what was, for what is, and for what will be, I will still continue to fight for its preservation, always!" ~TTA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

What were my attacks?

You were banned remember?

 

So in other words, predicting that someone will come to RMT's aid each time anyone offers to challenge him, is useless, seeing as how that is always going to be the case.

Totally wrong. First of all, me jumping in here doesn't aid RMT, in fact he probably wishes you, me and everyone else would just shut up and talk about time travel. 2nd, you are not challenging anything. You have been invited to do just so in some recently bumped threads but I doubt you have the capacity. In this thread you are harassing a long time contributor of valuable insight and information. I know you don't intend to be like this. Don't worry, time is on your side. You'll grow out of it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Bogz,

 

How goes the reading of my past posts?

 

You were banned remember?

The reason, for which I was, obviously eludes you.

 

What attacks have I done recently to RMT, is perhaps more apt?

 

Answer that one!

 

Totally wrong. First of all, me jumping in here doesn't aid RMT…

Again, I believe your definitions need updating.

 

What else would you call someone coming to the aid of someone in support?

 

But I guess you wouldn't know, since you're speaking for him, and can't see past your hero worship!

 

2nd, you are not challenging anything. You have been invited to do just so in some recently bumped threads but I doubt you have the capacity.

I doubt you have the capacity as well, by just responding to your ill-informed statements!

 

In this thread you are harassing a long time contributor of valuable insight and information. I know you don't intend to be like this. Don't worry, time is on your side. You'll grow out of it.

Wow, that's some high praise for RMT, but unfortunately, your statements are biased and inaccurate. RMT began this thread with slander and an attack on me for the reason why he deactivated his PM's. I posted in response to this and attempted to set the record straight, while you and Freud barged in and became involved without a clue of what was going on, and ATTACKED ME!

 

TTA

 

 

"For what was, for what is, and for what will be, I will still continue to fight for its preservation, always!" ~TTA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

What attacks have I done recently to RMT, is perhaps more apt?

Look if you are not even aware that you are attacking RMT and need evidence of your own actions then I suggest you talk to Freud or someone like him.

 

RMT began this thread with slander and an attack on me for the reason why he deactivated his PM's.

Bring that post RMT made and tell the person you talk to you feel it was a attack and slander against you so he can get the dose right.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Freudian

 

Look if you are not even aware that you are attacking RMT and need evidence of your own actions then I suggest you talk to Freud or someone like him.

I need to talk to Freud, that quacky quack who attacked me and posted a picture saying "I'd fit right in?"

 

What are you smoking?

 

Bring that post RMT made and tell the person you talk to you feel it was a attack and slander against you so he can get the dose right.

I'll tell you what, I'll do this, if you bring my "attacks" and tell him/or her to give you something for the anxiety headaches. Fair deal?

 

TTA

 

 

"For what was, for what is, and for what will be, I will still continue to fight for its preservation, always!" ~TTA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just To Speak Truth...

 

I don't mean to butt-in bogz. But I sensed a statement that is demonstrably False that you replied to:

 

???-RMT began this thread

Only four words into the statement, and it is demonstrably False. Strike One.

 

???-RMT began this thread with slander and an attack on me

Just checking.... still demonstrably False. Strike Two.
???-RMT began this thread with slander and an attack on me for the reason why he deactivated his PM's.

That makes FALSE on 3 counts. 2 of which anyone can verify for themselves at the beginning of this thread. Strike 3. (Unless he goes back to modify his earlier posts...)

The TRUTH is, I did NOT begin this thread.

 

RMT

 

 

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...