Jump to content

If any of you have really time traveled contact me


Recommended Posts

whatever! im so not wasting my energy on you , your so stuck on physic and cannot fathom that there might be more out there if you would calm down and stop looking for thing you dont understand and open your mind to new field and theory you would see that they would work ,, join me on messenger i will give you more but be polite i dont stand for insulte

 

[email protected]

 

 

i was taken (gasp)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All of a sudden, you are answering NO questions whatsoever. So, I take it that because you did not answer my question about your Doctorate degree, that you actually have none?

 

your so stuck on physic and cannot fathom that there might be more out there

I am more than willing to "fathom" it. But so far, all you have done is bleat-on about it, but provided absolutely NO details. None. Nada. Zilch. ZERO. Nothing but rhetoric from you, with no substance. This is the clear mark of a scammer who has no clue about real science.

 

open your mind to new field and theory you would see that they would work

My mind is open...here I am, just waiting for you to pour all your great knowledge into it. But still, you have not even answered my question about how a 2 phase mechanical motor creates an "inner singularity". You have nothing to sell. You are the naked king... and everyone sees you as naked.

 

join me on messenger i will give you more but be polite i dont stand for insulte

I follow charlatans nowhere. Lest you forget, YOU CAME HERE and you made some claims that I am now asking you to back up. You can't. So now, your new tactic is to "lead me into your own realm". Not gonna work. You came here. Either you start talking science, or you can just leave.

 

Which brings up another point that speaks to your integrity: Several times now you have claimed that you are "done with me". Yet you cannot stop from replying. This inability to abide by what you say you are going to do should be an indication to anyone who is thinking of giving you money.

 

Your move, Dooku,

 

RMT

 

 

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

Link to post
Share on other sites

doctorz

 

Oops, sorry. I forgot to warn you about the resident troll on this forum. Just don't give him an audience. There are those of us around that are interested in what you have to say. I'm one of them. I suspect wolf is also very interested too. So don't let one narrow minded individual upset you that much. He doesn't have any power if you don't let him.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure Einstein...egg him on... you know I will just love it that much more.

 

Oh. BTW... here is some information on this "Stan Deyo" he has invoked:

 

http://www.computernewbie.info/wheatdogg/2006/02/09/reality-1-stan-deyo-0/

 

Written by Philip Ross: "I came across Stan Deyo when a friend who is a conservative, Pentecostal Christian, tried to tell me that Einstein's theories of relativity had been proven wrong. I asked him for the reference and he handed me a book called 'The Cosmic Conspiracy.'

 

 

 

I have degrees in engineering, law and arts. I practise as a lawyer, mainly in litigation, and I am well accustomed to rigorous technical analysis, both in civil litigation and in a research project in which I was involved several years ago. My first impression of the book was that nobody would take it seriously. It is poorly written, disjoint, made many extravagant claims on an unsatisfactory evidential basis and published what purported to be a set of equations which 'proved' Einstein had made an error. I do not recall the precise details and I have long since thrown the book into the rubbish, but as I recall Deyo made a fairly obvious mistake by trying to equate a Newtonian formula with a relativistic one. As Newtonian mechanics is merely an approximation of relativity in circumstances where relativistic effects are minimal, it is hardly surprising that he found inconsistency.

 

 

 

I did find it odd that anyone would take this nonsense seriously and I wondered about his background. Not particularly surprising was the dearth of detail about his background and qualifications in the book. There was reference to involvement in secret projects, but no detail, and of course such claims are easily made but impossible to prove or disprove. Most significantly there were no records of qualifications from any recognised university or research institute and nothing I saw that suggested that he was qualified in any field.

 

 

 

I knew nothing of his supposed status as an 'expert' on earthquake prediction until I stumbled across this website but I think he can safely be regarded as a charlatan. If there were a correlation between ocean surface temperature and earthquake incidence one might imagine that the records of recent earthquakes in coastal areas such as Los Angeles, San Francisco, Kobe (Japan), Indonesia and in other countries (including my own country, New Zealand) could be correlated. I am not aware that anyone has established a statistically significant link and I cannot see any scientific justification for supposing that one exists."

 

You kiddies have fun... But leave the real science to those who can explain it such that other professionals can reproduce it readily.

 

RMT

 

 

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...

 

Am I missing something here or are we, on this thread, posting to and lamenting the lack of response from the person who started this thread, Quantum Leaper? A person who hasn't posted in four years, only posted four times - all over the course of about 24 hours and whose second post was:

 

Quantum_Leaper

 

stranger

 

Reged: 04/05/05

 

Posts: 4

 

Why are we listening to these nuts on here?

 

04/05/05 06:15 PM (131.15.48.59) Edit Reply

 

To the forumn,

 

These nuts on here claim to have traveled in tim? I say they are delusional, but if they could provide some kind of concrete, physical evidence then I would believe it

Just out of curiosity, did anyone actually expect him to respond or did we not read the date on the first post on the thread? Just curious.

 

 

Just another damned cowboy with a college education.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Satown,

 

True . But after taking the squareroot of the result in the denominator it becomes imaginary for all v^2 > c^2. For the force to be real the mass in the numerator has to also be imaginary.

 

We have no idea what the meaning of imaginary mass is.

 

 

Just another damned cowboy with a college education.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

all this talk is giving me an headache , stop talking and start working if you think you got better idea than mine then move your butt from the seat and doing something about it ,,me at least im trying my best LOL

 

in any case dont you guys think this topic went off course ,,way of course , the guy is searching for a solution and all he got to see was some insginifiant pickering , come on do your best to answer his call i know im trying

 

yo Quantum leaper as soon as i got a solid solution i'll let you know this i swear

 

Sincerly

 

DR Z

 

 

i was taken (gasp)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
all this talk is giving me an headache , stop talking and start working if you think you got better idea than mine then move your butt from the seat and doing something about it ,,me at least im trying my best LOL

 

in any case dont you guys think this topic went off course ,,way of course , the guy is searching for a solution and all he got to see was some insginifiant pickering , come on do your best to answer his call i know im trying

 

yo Quantum leaper as soon as i got a solid solution i'll let you know this i swear

 

Sincerly

are you typing with your feet?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
doctorz

 

Oops, sorry. I forgot to warn you about the resident troll on this forum. Just don't give him an audience. There are those of us around that are interested in what you have to say. I'm one of them. I suspect wolf is also very interested too. So don't let one narrow minded individual upset you that much. He doesn't have any power if you don't let him.

Doctorz:

 

I second that motion. Some people will try to take the wind right out of your sails. Don,t let them to it. In my day here I had a lot of constructive feed back that I found very useful. But, sometimes it goes beyond constructive to destructive. You just have to know what the difference when that is and not let it get to you.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
no i dont check my spelling when i type and i told everyone before my grammar suck

 

Im the doctor, not you!

Give him heck dude. If they are not complaining about your science they complain about your grammer and spelling. It is hard to win around here. I usually use a spell checker but when I don,t sometimes I get told about it.

 

When new people come here they are like fresh meat. You go through your little spill with everyone then they leave you along. Oh by the way welcome to the time travel institute. This is a fictional forum. Nothing here is ment to be real even though there is some talk about science here. If you post anything too technical most people here would scratch their heads and not understand it. The staff here (Unpaid) if you don,t already know is one engineer (RMT) and one head doctor (Darby) with an interest in science and one moderator who does not talk much. RMT as far as I know is a moderator in another topic here. When in there be careful he won,t hesitate to ban you. See you around.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
RMT as far as I know is a moderator in another topic here. When in there be careful he won,t hesitate to ban you.

Utter bull dung. Please back up this statement with evidence of "all those people" I have not "hesitated" to ban. On the contrary, I do not ban ANYONE without conferring with Raul.

 

Please correct your untrue, and emotionally-based, statement. Thanks.

 

RMT

 

 

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: If any of you have really time traveled contac

 

I second that motion. Some people will try to take the wind right out of your sails.

dont forget though, rmt is one of the smartest people on the forum. he got you to reform your experiment quite extensively.

 

he is usually brutally honest and that can sometimes be a good or bad thing. i never use a spell checker, and i usually type fine. when i first came here, it was a different story.

 

i have found that you can argue alot here, or learn alot.

 

either way, i agree with rmt. in my opinion, the doc has no proof, therefore should not be believed. simple as that.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Reactor:

 

Any success in your endeavour?

 

Peace.

 

Luis.

Sorry guy I almost missed your post. Yes I have had some success which I did not post because my method of time travel is not yet accepted. Since my method is not accepted anything I post from that method will also not be accepted. I get tired of debating and fighting so it is easier for me to just deal with it by myself. I am improving my rolling checksum counters. I have more than one. I have applications for finding the max and min checksums of the files I am searching for in the future or the past. I set up template files then run my programs to give me what I need to know to run my counters. I wrote an application to check for a email header file off my counters to make sure it is real and I wrote a program to spell check batch files which can also be used to search for words and phrases in batch files too off my counters. So, I am doing pretty well at setting up a system to communicate with myself in the future or the past which is what I am doing is all about. The 4th dimension only allows time travel in one direction but with a computer we can set up a information route with decryption, data mining, and other known parameters to allow time travel in both directions from the 4th dimension with audio, video, text, and any other computer file we want. No one is going to take the wind out of my sails. I wrote a program for checking a Mac code (machine authentication code) for sending myself messages but right now I put that on hold because I am looking at everything I generate when possible. I have a program to verify JPG or BPM files off my checksum counter but I want a program to verify if it is as close to possible to a real world pic or not. I am still looking for a specific method for that. I think I can use a root mean square file and a standard deviation file but I would have to have lots and lots of pics to set that up so I am looking for short cuts. I have a method down on paper for verifying a video or movie by looking at the checksums from one frame of video to another but I have not put that method to computer code yet. And, I have to come up with a method for looking at the audio later. I have an account on a cray computer which I have used a little but I have to finish re-compiling my programs to linx/unix to fully use that account. Also I only have dial up except when I am "War driving" so I really need my own bandwith connection to really use my cray account. What I do is a lot of work and I work on this as much as I can. I spent all weekend on it and plan to spend probably at least two more years working on this. Thanks for asking.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reactor:

 

Don't give up because of certain people who flame you sometimes.

 

You're doing something that could be interesting in the future.

 

There are other inquiring minds that appreciate your work.

 

Please, feel free to relate your successes about your TT experiments.

 

Peace.

 

Luis.

 

 

The meek shall inherit the Earth - Jesus of Nazareth.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Reactor:

 

Don't give up because of certain people who flame you sometimes.

 

You're doing something that could be interesting in the future.

 

There are other inquiring minds that appreciate your work.

 

Please, feel free to relate your successes about your TT experiments.

 

Peace.

 

Luis.

I appreciate that. I was thinking about doing a blitz in the future here with my time travel media but for now I have put that on hold. I want to improve what I am doing first and if I do a blitz here I need to be prepared for the negative stuff I might receive about my media. For right now I am going to hold off on that.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey rainmantime i want to see your myspace or facebook page , i want to see your face to see if your really who you claim you are

 

come on im waiting its been like 10 hours ago i ask

 

come on

 

 

i was taken (gasp)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doctorz

 

Well, I've gone over your story and schematic. I'm convinced you're telling the truth. I happen to know quite a bit about undiscovered physics. I investigate anomalies in my spare time. You have bits and pieces of the puzzle that fills in some of the gaps for me. The phenomena that you described, I believe is an aspect of the Lorentz force that has not been properly researched. You're not the first one to invent a machine that can turn something invisible. But you're the first to come forward and talk about how you did it. I think this knowledge has been suppressed for way too long. I don't entirely agree with you that everything in your schematic is needed. But I will agree with you that an antigravity drive can be developed from it. Only because I'll be putting one together this weekend. I just can't believe that I've overlooked something so simple. Maybe we can collaborate our knowledge and actually come up with a real time machine.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
hey rainmantime i want to see your myspace or facebook page , i want to see your face to see if your really who you claim you are

 

come on im waiting its been like 10 hours ago i ask

Doctor Bubba:

 

It has been a lot longer than 10 hours since I have asked MANY questions of you, and you have still not answered a single one. WTF makes you so damn pushy to think that you can demand ANYTHING of me? And what, exactly, do you think seeing my face is going to do for you?

 

Methinks you are OCD, as well as delusional.

 

RMT

 

 

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doc,

 

Thanks for the advice, rook. I've only been at this for 10 years, so I haven't caught on yet. I'll be sure to "move my butt" on your command. ;)

 

Anyway, now that my butt is moving, can you enlighten me on where I went wrong with the math involving division of complex numbers in the post that you just responded to?

 

Thanks

 

 

Just another damned cowboy with a college education.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...