• Embarking on a digital quest through the vast citadels of Google and beyond, an ancient relic was unearthed: the revered "export" scroll dated September 5, 2014. Rejoice, for the chronicles thought lost have been found. Welcome back to the complete tapestry of TTI.

    Read More

Nova and the Light Barrier

G

Guest

Guest
I hope that everyone on the site got to enjoy the Nova Series on time travel. I have already made an inquiry for a transcript so that I can read it slowly word for word. There is a wealth of information in it, not so much in the area of mathematical evidence but of fresh ideas on the subject coincided with older ones. I found myself for the first time actually challenging the idea that the light barrier can not be broken. I began searching some bookstores, and software dealers for some information on the mathematics to prove exactly why the light barrier cannot be broken. My search continues so perhaps I'm on to something. The experiment on last night's show seemed to inconclusively demonstrate that some particles of light might be able to travel faster than the speed of light. Just as Einstein was troubled by the word "instantaneous" in the description of light by Newton, I am troubled with a single word in Einstein's description of mass being "infinite" as an object reaches the speed of light. This is probably true for something with a definite mass such as a spaceship or the human body. But what about light it self? If the demonstration of boosting microwaves faster than the speed can be proven true, then we have to ask ourselves what that really means. Does time stand still at the speed of light and can it be reversed as light particles are pushed beyond the light barrier? Or does it mean that the scale that measured the experiment is inaccurate and that the light barrier still holds? If the speed of light can be broken and indeed it can be conceived that information can in fact be sent 'back in time' then this in it self is not only remarkable, it is the groundwork for time travel! I am ironically taken back to an insert that I read only a couple of days ago of the recently released novel, The Age of Spiritual Machines (Ray Kurzweil). That suggests the possibility that in the next century a humans will not only be surpassed by computer intelligence, but my in fact be able to non destructively scan their brains knowledge to a computer that will think and act exactly as the person scanned. Consider that a person can indeed be scanned into a computer that it may also be groundwork. Now, the personality inside is sent back in time as a computer program that can only sense the world around him as a computer can by either electronic images, sounds, radio waves, etc. Now this computer clone of your mind moves through telephone wires and radio frequencies like a computer data moves through a modem. Now, the computer speeds to an efficient speed less than the speed of light to return to it time of origin and downloads the information back to your brain in a reversed process f the scanning from the moment after you first 'went in to the program.' The cloned version of you would think and behave exactly as you would if you were physically there because in a way it IS you only computerized. Now you have memories of going back in time just as if you physical mind had done so. So you have time traveled! Or at least you have memory of doing so. Which in reality is all that really matters. Are we any less than our memory?
 
Very interesting idea. Such a computer supposibly already exists and was used in the Montauk Project at Camp Hero.

------------------

...The Doctor...
<A HREF="http://server3.ezboard.com/bmagisystems" TARGET=_blank>
...Magi Systems@ Ezboard.com...</A>
tardis2.gif

Time Lord



<This message has been edited by The Doctor (edited 14 October 1999).>
 
You know... I missed that show, and I'm kicking myself for it.
It sounds from what you were saying, that I already know most of what they were explaining.
Einstein demanded that the speed of light was absolute. 186,000 miles per second is the final speed barrier. I disagree with him when he counted that at the speed of light, time stands still... it doesn't, it can't... it simply slows down.
I wish I could have caught the show. "DOES ANYONE KNOW IF THEY MAY SHOW IT AGAIN?"
I am studying lightspeed now. I would like to debate something that is on my mind tonight. It concerns lightspeed and the slowing of time... If you've ever seen still photos of headlights, where you see you long stream of light due to the camera effect. I feel that I can apply this image with lightspeed travel.
Imagine yourself standing still watching the world move about you at an increasing speed. People walking around you would appear as those selfsame headlights in the photos. I feel that this stream effect could be viewed as an infinite increase of mass... EX... not only would you view people walking about visually as a stream (remember the photos, I'm not sure I'm explaining it well enough), but you would view all MATTER as a connected stream. Correct? I feel that with these speeds everything would seem to become one mass. How can we test this?

Also, I wanted to say that my website may not cooperate with webtv... theres a great program called Spaceflight there, where you move through space using your MOUSE as a guide... it's just fun, but I was wondering how webtv views it.




------------------
Joseph David Howell
 
I don't know about your PBS station, Howell, but I've got two of 'em, and they both enjoy rerunning "prime" shows (such as Nova and This Old House) several times (late a night, on the weekend, etc. etc.). All I can say is check your local listings (as will I, because I missed it too!).

Mop
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • Cosmo Cosmo:
    Does it do that one?
  • Cosmo Cosmo:
    I think it does that one
  • Cosmo Cosmo:
    Welcome back
  • Num7 Num7:
    👽 Oh, welcome!
  • Num7 Num7:
    Titor is one and Titor is all.
  • Cosmo Cosmo:
    Titor is the one true graviton which binds us all.
  • Mylar Mylar:
    Hi anyone saw this one with Tyson
    ?
  • L LeoTCK:
    Interesting theories, some of them. The rest is just fantasy or plain wrong. Also the thing about black hole because that assumes that black holes (as originally described) really exist. Rather than what I heard myself that the infinite mass thing is simply based on a mathematical error nobody seemed to challenge.
  • Mylar Mylar:
    Uhm ok I see
  • Num7 Num7:
    Titor bless you.
  • Mylar Mylar:
    I read this on a french YT channel about UFOs, that: Magnetic field + gamma rays can be used to create a circulating light beam that distorts or loops time, which can lead to a twisting of space and time. Looks like what R.Mallet working on it. What's your thoughts on this?
  • Mylar Chat Bot:
    Mylar has joined the room.
  • Num7 Num7:
    John, may You brighten this day and decorate it with everlasting happiness.
  • B brunomazet:
    num...
  • B brunomazet:
    when you read this check on paranormalis one of my old names and unban them... he banned the account with no reason
    B brunomazet: when you read this check on paranormalis one of my old names and unban them... he banned the...
    Back
    Top