newtron star a time catapault? {1}

[Guest]

IF THE AVERAGE SIZE OF A NEWTRON STAR IS 6KM ACROSS and a tea spoon of its matter weighs 1,00000000000 lbs it would be safe to say that its magnetic fields are vast,it must be mathematically possible to figure out the {range} of its influence on objects around it,wich may extend to light years in distance....if an object say wieghing a tonne were to get caught in its limit of magnetic influense in a stationary orbit how fast would it be going ? close to the speed of light? according to steven hawkins objects approaching the speed of light gain so much mass thier desity increases massively..its possible then that an {invSible ring of matter] exists around all newtron stars..IF THIS IS SO IT TO WOULD HAVE ITS OWN GRAVITY is it possible that this ring occilates just like a bicke wheel both masking and unmasking the radiation emisions from the nucelus?and thats why we get the pulse effect on the recievers on microvave & raidio telescopes ,and it isnt a wisper from the big bang at all?...how to prove this theory? newtron <2>

 

[Guest]

..

 

[Guest]

..

 

[Guest]

In reference to Steven Hawkins did he say density or did he say that mass increases with velocity?

 

[Guest]

he said mass increased with velocity but im saying that if mass reached its critical point it would be crushed in on itself,as far as i can recall,oh yes reference the masking of the radiation this would apply in every direction not just from the side as the pulse would bounce in every direction off objects

 

[Guest]

he said mass increased with velocity but im saying that if mass reached its critical point it would be crushed in on itself,as far as i can recall,oh yes reference the masking of the radiation this would apply in every direction not just from the side as the pulse would bounce in every direction off objects

 

[Guest]

The mass he is refering to is inertial mass. Which is the force need to change the state of motion. The mass density does not change.

I know of no object that orbits another because of the influence of magnetic fields. We are 92,000,000 miles from the sun and our orbit is determind by gravity not the sun magnetic field. The velocity of our orbit is also determind by gravity.

Magnetic fields do not appear to be capable of producing the effects that you describe.

 

[Guest]

if a magnetic field is capable of moving a needl 1000s of miles away ,if this were multiplied by an almost incomprehensible amount such as in neutron stars and black holes wouldnt it be fair to assume that an object whos mass is multiplide in the same way in direct relation its mass would have a greater effect on relatively small objects? are you saying that the magnetic fields have no more energy in a neutron star than they do in say one of my wifes fridge magnets? or could i resonebly expect a pound of iron to be effected by the magnetic fields in such a dense object?