Director's "proof" image

[The Doctor]

Director\'s \"proof\" image

I have received the director's "proof" image and by blurring it you can see a face in the vortex. Some have had problems with the image but want to see it so I've converted the blurred image to jpg format to "kill" any viruses. I uploaded it to my site so that you may view it. If you want the original drawing just sharpen the image. It is at http://www.geocities.com/magisystems/proof2.jpg .

 

[pamela]

RE: Director\'s \"proof\" image

Doc,
maybe you could provide the original clear picture to. some people might not have the ability to sharpen the picture.
actualy I didnt think much of the picture until I saw another invention that had a similar swirling pattern to it with alot more technical things and explanations and a particle accelerator sitting at the bottom of the swirls. then I started wondering if maybe there was something to it. and he just sent "part" of it.
don't know though.....

 

[The Doctor]

RE: Director\'s \"proof\" image

I'll try to put the original on my site as well but it will have to be jpg format because some computers will not recognize the original. Hey send me the one with the technical stuff on it.

------------------
...~The Doctor~...

 

[The Doctor]

RE: Director\'s \"proof\" image

I uploaded the original jpg conversion to my site of the "proof" it is at http://www.geocities.com/magisystems/proof1.jpg . Maybe the purpose of the image is to prove that images or holograms can be projected on a vortex. I'm not sure of his intentions. On the other hand it might be a joke. Tell me what you think. Geocities is having technicial difficulties so if you can't get to the page the first time try again later.

------------------
...~The Doctor~...
"There is no time to waste, only time to change"..."The sum of all knowledge is that you and your reality do not exist; only thought and imagination are real, and therefore...I am."


<This message has been edited by The Doctor (edited 10 July 2000).>

 

[pamela]

RE: Director\'s \"proof\" image

Hey Doc,
I'll ask him and see if he wants to share it.
it was given to me but dont know if he wants it shared.
-pamela

<This message has been edited by pamela (edited 11 July 2000).>

 

[Jack D]

RE: Director\'s \"proof\" image

Check out the image on Doc's site (Proof1) and than back away from the computer screen. To me, it kind of looks like there's an evil bunny thing in the middle.

Check it out!

 

[Time02112]

RE: Director\'s \"proof\" image

Wecome back Jack D!
we missed hearing from you.

 

[Edwin Gary Schasteen]

RE: Director\'s \"proof\" image

The only problem I see with utilizing two pyramids is the turbulance created by the spinning of the pyramids as a result of its topology. Upon splitting the field with a the niney degree out of phase alternations with a differential strength of plus and minus 45 percent per cycle will translate to an infinite turbulence manifested in to oppossing forces of infinite strength within the vortex which already produces a increasing amount of singularities exponentially. Where the amount of singularities increases exponenetially with each cycle. This is with a uniform mass such as a sphere producing the affect. If one were to take into comsideration the extra opposing infinite force produce by the spinning pyramid model on the amount of singularities produced in a period time 0 to time1 would increase in number an additional square root of the original plus the origanal number of singularities per time. A greater yield of energy will be aquired the output will be infinite modulated wave with a finite carrier wave of infinite density.

Edwin G. Schasteen [email protected]