• Embarking on a digital quest through the vast citadels of Google and beyond, an ancient relic was unearthed: the revered "export" scroll dated September 5, 2014. Rejoice, for the chronicles thought lost have been found. Welcome back to the complete tapestry of TTI.

    Read More

Communicating with the future - an idea

G

Guest

Guest
I'm not a physicist so I don't know if this is possible but here is the idea anyway.

Today we can't send a message to communicate with the past but it would seem possible that at some point in the future someone will be able to. Now if this happens how will we talk back or can we? Here is where the idea comes in. If I receive a message from some time in the future and I record a response (say on a CD) and store it then at some point in the future the person sending the message could retrieve the disk and listen to my response. The result would be two way communications. The only problem would be protecting the message long term and putting it somewhere it could be found.

I'm sure realtivity or astral physics or something explains why this isn't possible but just the same I thought it was interesting. Feel free to reference a FAQ or something that explains why this isn't possible.

Thanks,
Craig
 
It seems to me that your CD message disc would have to progress into the future at a rate greater than 1/1 or normal time rate in order to catch the sender of the original ( reverse-time) message.

In other words during the lapsed time it used to go from, say June 1999 to June 2000, the back-sender would have proceeded ahead one year also, to June 2001 and the message from the past would from his perspective never show up.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • Cosmo Cosmo:
    Does it do that one?
  • Cosmo Cosmo:
    I think it does that one
  • Cosmo Cosmo:
    Welcome back
  • Num7 Num7:
    👽 Oh, welcome!
  • Num7 Num7:
    Titor is one and Titor is all.
  • Cosmo Cosmo:
    Titor is the one true graviton which binds us all.
  • Mylar Mylar:
    Hi anyone saw this one with Tyson
    ?
  • L LeoTCK:
    Interesting theories, some of them. The rest is just fantasy or plain wrong. Also the thing about black hole because that assumes that black holes (as originally described) really exist. Rather than what I heard myself that the infinite mass thing is simply based on a mathematical error nobody seemed to challenge.
  • Mylar Mylar:
    Uhm ok I see
  • Num7 Num7:
    Titor bless you.
  • Mylar Mylar:
    I read this on a french YT channel about UFOs, that: Magnetic field + gamma rays can be used to create a circulating light beam that distorts or loops time, which can lead to a twisting of space and time. Looks like what R.Mallet working on it. What's your thoughts on this?
  • Mylar Chat Bot:
    Mylar has joined the room.
    Mylar Chat Bot: Mylar has joined the room.
    Back
    Top